Amazon.com Widgets

Review: Dominion: Empires

6

Dominion Empires box

Dominion is my favorite game (and the one I’ve played the most), so I’m always excited about new expansion releases. I recognize that after many, many, many expansions, it can be exhausting to think about adding another one to your collection, especially if that involves sleeving new cards. But if that’s you, don’t tune out just yet. You still might need Empires in your collection.

How It Works

Dominion: Empires is an expansion for Dominion and follows the basic rules for the game. It introduces a few new concepts.

The first new concept is debt. Some cards now either cost or give debt tokens to players. Debt tokens may be paid off at any time during a player’s buy phase, but that player may not purchase anything until all debt tokens are paid off.

Empires introduces split piles, where several piles contain two different cards that interact in some way with each other. The first five cards are on top, and players may only purchase the top card of the pile.

The victory tokens in Dominion: Empires (and Prosperity--I keep them mixed together).
The victory tokens in Dominion: Empires (and Prosperity–I keep them mixed together).

Empires includes victory point tokens (seen earlier in the Prosperity expansion), which some cards grant to players. There are also new “gathering” actions that place victory point tokens on certain card piles and include some way for players to take the points on the piles.

Associated with victory point tokens, Empires includes landmark cards, which offer additional global scoring conditions for the game.

Duration cards (introduced in the Seaside expansion), which stay in play until their effects wane, return in Empires as well, as do events from Adventures.

Bigger and Better, or Crushed Under Its Own Weight?

Empires is the second Dominion set that was not part of the original release plan. And much like Adventures, it changes the game quite a bit from previous sets. And much like Adventures, it is awesome.

Landmarks, to me, are the biggest value to this expansion. They change the rules of the game, making new strategies viable.
Landmarks, to me, are the biggest value to this expansion. They change the rules of the game, making new strategies viable.

The aspect of Empires that changes the game the most is landmark cards. Landmarks offer alternate scoring conditions beyond the usual estates, duchies, provinces, and colonies. Some landmarks offer end-of-game victory bonuses or penalties (like Wall, which loses a player 1 point for each card beyond fifteen in his or her deck, or Wolf Den, which penalizes players for having only one copy of a card), some offer victory points when players do something in-game (like Tomb, which grants 1 VP when you trash a card), and some receive points at setup that are depleted throughout the game, making a mini-game race to collect the points before other players do.

It’s hard to overstate how much I love landmark cards. LOVE them. In prior rankings, I listed Intrigue as the most essential expansion for Dominion because of all the additional victory cards it added. In my opinion, the best way to add variety to Dominion is to change the goals for victory. I don’t think Intrigue is obsolete, but Empires does the most of any set thus far to change the goal of each game. Not only do the landmarks make it a new puzzle every time, but they also inject a lot of fun into the game. It’s fun to race the other players to score “free” points, and it’s fun to try to win in ways that weren’t really viable without the extra boost. The landmarks are a game changer for Dominion.

The new event cards in Empires. These are so much fun to use.
The new event cards in Empires. These are so much fun to use.

The new event cards also offer new ways to score points. I loved the victory point tokens when they were introduced in Prosperity, and here they are working harder than ever. There’s Conquest, which gives a player two silvers and 1 VP for each silver that player has gained this turn. (Imagine the fun you can have with this and Hinterlands’ Trader.) There’s Salt the Earth, which gives you victory points in exchange for trashing victory cards from the supply. And then there’s the trick shot Dominate, which costs 14 but grants a player a province and 9 VPs. The events let players make cards more expensive through debt or allow players to buy cards cheaper (and take debt instead). Again, events change the game, and the events introduced in Empires are so much fun to use.

I love the debt concept, and the included metal debt tokens are a good way to track it.
I love the debt concept, and the included metal debt tokens are a good way to track it.

I love the concept of debt, which is kind of a reversal of coin tokens from Guilds. Both debt and coin tokens allow a player to control the flow of money in their decks, at least to an extent. Debt allows players to buy better cards on credit while mortgaging the usefulness of later turns. Most cards that cost debt are amazing and can be purchased turn 1…but it’s not usually not worth it to do so. (City Quarter lets you draw cards if you have actions in your hand; Royal Blacksmith lets you draw five cards, but you can’t keep any coppers in your hand.) I find this to be a brilliant balance. Debt doesn’t hurt you at the end of the game, so if you can find a way to use it to your advantage, you can get cards as the game ends and, essentially, not have to pay for them. (Capital is a great example: it’s worth 6 coins, but you take 6 debt when discarded from play.) But if the game doesn’t end when you think it will, you might have a big bill coming due. I was expecting debt to play a bigger role in the expansion, and I’m a little disappointed it didn’t. I like what’s included, but it seems like there’s still some design space to be explored here. (Maybe it will make a return in a future expansion.)

Split piles have two different kinds of cards, one stacked on top of the other. You only have access to the top card. Cards from split piles, naturally, combo well together.
Split piles have two different kinds of cards, one stacked on top of the other. You only have access to the top card. Cards from split piles, naturally, combo well together.

I was initially cool on the split piles idea, but after playing many games with them, I find them to be a fun addition (more than the novelty of the traveler piles in Adventures, which I’ve cooled on a bit). Split piles pair two five-card supply decks into one pile, and you can’t get the bottom deck without the first being gone. There’s the Gladiator/Fortune pile: the Gladiators help kill other Gladiators to get to the Fortunes, and then Fortune, when you buy it, rewards you for having Gladiators. There’s Catapult/Rocks: Catapult allows you to attack other players when you trash the right cards, and Rocks is just the right card to trash. I like the split piles because the cards on the bottom are, in general, very desirable, so players are trying to manipulate the game in such a way as to get to those better cards sooner. Again, this is a fun way to change up the game, and I like that each game with a split pile has at least one combo that newer players can spot and exploit.

Gathering cards add interaction to the game without adding attacks..
Gathering cards add interaction to the game without adding attacks.

I was surprised by the new “gathering” cards, which increase the interaction in the game without adding attacks. When I initially read the card previews for Empires on Board Game Geek, I thought these seemed kind of lame. In practice, however, they add a lot to the game. Gathering piles work similar to the landmarks that have victory points on them at setup except that points accumulate and are disbursed due to player actions. There’s Temple, for example, which allows players to trash cards and gain VPs, but it also places VPs on the Temple pile. When you gain Temple, you get the VPs on the pile. This is tricky, because while Temple is a desirable card to use, after you have one, it’s not necessarily a desirable card to gain. So you have to weigh whether it’s worth it to add a card you don’t want to your deck simply to gain the extra VPs. Wild Hunt offers a similar tough choice: either draw 3 cards and place a VP on Wild Hunt, or gain an estate and seize the VPs on Wild Hunt. It might be easy to pass up at first, but as the game progresses, it becomes harder and harder to ignore.

There are still some fun attacks in Empires. Legionary is especially powerful, but it doesn't come off every time you play the card.
There are still some fun attacks in Empires. Legionary is especially powerful, but it doesn’t come off every time you play the card.

I’m not very good at timing my purchases or actions to gain what’s on the gathering piles, and I feel like other players are much better at it than I am, but I love this mechanism. It injects the game with friendly competition. No one is being outright attacked, but you have to monitor what other players are doing if you don’t want to miss out on these points. I’ve always said that Dominion is not multiplayer solitaire, but Empires makes my claim more tenable with doubters.

The castle pile is one of the curios in Empires. A victory pile with shifting cards? Intriguing.
The castle pile is one of the curios in Empires. A victory pile with shifting cards? Intriguing.

There are plenty of other curios in Empires to enjoy. There’s Villa, which when bought goes directly into your hand, gives you another action, and returns you to your action phase. There’s Crown, which plays a treasure or action twice, depending on what you need. There’s Enchantress, an attack that makes the next action card each opponent plays a +1 card/+1 action vanity. And then there’s the castle pile, where each card in the stack is a new victory card that interacts somehow with the rest of the cards in the pile. Simply, there’s a lot of fun cards to explore in this set.

Usually, when I get a new Dominion set, I’m not a fan of the mix of cards if I use just the new set. Seaside, for example, feels a bit out of control on its own. Mix it with any other set, and I like it a lot. But on its own? Too wild. Empires is an exception here, like Prosperity and Intrigue before it. Yes, the card mix is a bit quirky if you use only Empires cards, but it avoids the main sin of being annoying. The games I’ve played with just Empires do tend to take a little longer, especially as players familiarize themselves with the cards. This is to be expected, to some degree: one of the chief temptations of Dominion is to buy the “fun” cards and forget about how you win.

My Empires storage solution.
My Empires storage solution.

And Empires is a set with a lot of somewhat complicated effects on the cards–complicated, at least, for new players. Empires is not nearly as fiddly or complex as Adventures or Dark Ages, but it’s a step above Prosperity (probably about equal with Guilds) and the victory tokens are more fiddly than in the earlier set. So I wouldn’t necessarily recommend that new players jump right in here. But aside from the complexity warning, I don’t have anything bad to say about the set.

The "made in the USA" logo was a source of skepticism for many after Adventures, but I find Empires to be a return to the good quality of the earlier sets, even though it is manufactured in the USA.
The “made in the USA” logo was a source of skepticism for many after Adventures, but I find Empires to be a return to the good quality of the earlier sets, even though it is manufactured in the USA.

The components here are quite good. The illustrations for this set are some of the best, and they are more consistently good. There are also a lot more of them: several piles have two different cards in them, and each event and landmark has its own illustration. The included metal tokens are also hefty and serve their purpose well. They’re a huge upgrade from Adventures’ hard-to-read, darkly printed cardboard ones, and the metal victory point tokens are more distinguishable at a glance than Prosperity’s. (I have mine mixed together, but I might separate them out: the Empires ones really are preferable.) The card quality here is back to normal. I wasn’t fully upset with Adventures’ mismatch in feel with earlier Dominion sets, but it was noticeable. Empires, at least from my tests, is indistinguishable from earlier sets.

It may be too soon to say, but Empires is at least on trajectory to become my favorite Dominion set. It takes what I love about my two former favorites–the high-roller money hands and powerful (read: expensive) cards of Prosperity and the sneaky alternate victory conditions of Intrigue–and blends them in one expansion while also introducing novel concepts and fun new puzzles. What Adventures did in challenging dogma in actions, Empires does for victory conditions. The beautiful thing about Dominion is that all former sets still work, and still work well within the system. But these latter expansions, Adventures and now Empires, might provide the best bang for your buck and are certainly among the most fun to play. Empires is a complete game changer for Dominion, and it proves that even after eight years and eleven card sets, Dominion is still the freshest thing in deck building.

  • Rating 10
  • User Ratings (2 Votes) 10
    Your Rating:
Summary

Pros:

Extends the life of the game considerably by offering new victory conditions (landmarks)
Fun new cards offer new challenges and puzzles for players
Lots of grueling trade-off decisions
Retains most of the simple gameplay of earlier Dominion sets

Cons:

The complexity here is more than most Dominion sets
VP tokens, especially on gathering piles/landmarks, can be a little fiddly
It didn't come out sooner--where has this set been all my life?

10.0 Fit for a King

I'll try anything once, but my favorite games are generally middleweight Euros.

Discussion6 Comments

  1. Pingback: Review Roundup | Tabletop Gaming News

  2. What are your thoughts on playing sacrifice and Small Castle? Would you allow the benefit from Small Castle when trashed (gain a new castle) when played simultaneously with Sacrifice and also gain that benefit (+2 cards, +2 actions, +2 victory points)? Do you get both benefits, or only the Sacrifice benefit?

    • I don’t know if I would take this as an official ruling, but here’s how I read it:

      Since Small Castle is an action card that says “Trash This” rather than a straight up victory card that says “When you trash this” you only get the bonus if you play Small Castle as an action and resolve that action. If you use Sacrifice or any other card that trashes other cards (Chapel, Upgrade, etc) to trash the Small Castle, you are not playing Small Castle as an action and you do not gain the benefit of the action.

Reply To Kristin Cancel Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: